Dawn Felagund (
dawn_felagund) wrote2010-06-05 07:59 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Sugarloaf Mountain
Today, Bobby and I went hiking out in Frederick County at Sugarloaf Mountain. Sugarloaf Mountain is a monadnock, or stand-alone mountain; all of the other mountains around it have since eroded away. (The Appalachians were once the highest above-water mountain range in the world. They're significantly humbler now, but they've earned the right. :) Because Sugarloaf is largely composed of quartzite, it has resisted the erosion that has destroyed its brethren.
The hike was beautiful. We started by getting the worst part over: climbing to the summit. We've done worse--it was about a four-hundred foot climb over a quarter-mile, so rather steep but not long, at least--but I am really out-of-shape. We hardly hiked at all last year, and I'm not even really sure why. That quarter-mile climb sure reminded me of our negligence last year, though.
The "east view" from the parking lot. We are looking toward home. Actually, Sugarloaf Mountain only has about 200 feet of elevation on our house.

A panoramic of the east view:

The view from the top was splendid, of course. To the south, we could see the Potomac River. It was an overcast day--actually, it rained most of the time we were there, but under the forest canopy, you can hear but not feel the rain--and hazy.
The view from the top:


Bobby!

Me!

Bobby and me together!

The summit:


I found baby pinecones and am very excited about them.



After we scrambled around on some rocks and explored the summit, we climbed back down, discovering in the process that, of course, luck would have it that we'd selected the most difficult of three trails for our ascent. Alas, the exercise and the challenge were both good for us.
Going down the green trail--the easy one!

Once at the bottom again, we did a short loop around back to the parking lot, more or less along a ridge partway up the mountain. There were frequent spectacular views from there as well. There are longer trails that we want to try next time, skipping the summit and going for the long haul.



A cool-looking 'shroom we found that we photographed in order to identify.

Finally, last year, we saw Sugarloaf Mountain too ... in Ireland. *whine*

In non-mountain-related news, I am no longer a squatter on LJ. I have purchased another paid account for myself. Which I said that I was not going to do, being as I was/am/something pissed off at LJ. But I've decided that 1) I know the place, 2) all of my friends are here, and 3) no matter what, LJ ain't going back to what it was. And I do believe in supporting groups financially when I use their service regularly, and I have been on LJ for over five years with five years' worth of rambling, pictures, and so on kept here. So I guess I'm back. And now I will have more than the same few icons that I've been using for the last year! And going to the full-page view of my LJ will use my layout and not the dull LJ layout. It's the little things.
(And no more ads! The big things too!)
The hike was beautiful. We started by getting the worst part over: climbing to the summit. We've done worse--it was about a four-hundred foot climb over a quarter-mile, so rather steep but not long, at least--but I am really out-of-shape. We hardly hiked at all last year, and I'm not even really sure why. That quarter-mile climb sure reminded me of our negligence last year, though.
The "east view" from the parking lot. We are looking toward home. Actually, Sugarloaf Mountain only has about 200 feet of elevation on our house.

A panoramic of the east view:

The view from the top was splendid, of course. To the south, we could see the Potomac River. It was an overcast day--actually, it rained most of the time we were there, but under the forest canopy, you can hear but not feel the rain--and hazy.
The view from the top:


Bobby!

Me!

Bobby and me together!

The summit:


I found baby pinecones and am very excited about them.



After we scrambled around on some rocks and explored the summit, we climbed back down, discovering in the process that, of course, luck would have it that we'd selected the most difficult of three trails for our ascent. Alas, the exercise and the challenge were both good for us.
Going down the green trail--the easy one!

Once at the bottom again, we did a short loop around back to the parking lot, more or less along a ridge partway up the mountain. There were frequent spectacular views from there as well. There are longer trails that we want to try next time, skipping the summit and going for the long haul.



A cool-looking 'shroom we found that we photographed in order to identify.

Finally, last year, we saw Sugarloaf Mountain too ... in Ireland. *whine*

In non-mountain-related news, I am no longer a squatter on LJ. I have purchased another paid account for myself. Which I said that I was not going to do, being as I was/am/something pissed off at LJ. But I've decided that 1) I know the place, 2) all of my friends are here, and 3) no matter what, LJ ain't going back to what it was. And I do believe in supporting groups financially when I use their service regularly, and I have been on LJ for over five years with five years' worth of rambling, pictures, and so on kept here. So I guess I'm back. And now I will have more than the same few icons that I've been using for the last year! And going to the full-page view of my LJ will use my layout and not the dull LJ layout. It's the little things.
(And no more ads! The big things too!)
no subject
I have purchased another paid account for myself.
It's funny to read this at this point in time, just because I just got myself another paid account today. Admittedly, just for 2 months - and then I'll see how it goes - but I was just sick and tired of the ads! I'm not even fussed about the userpics. (But I was on a sponsored account before, so the main upgrade is with the lack of ads, I think.)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
I remember how much it blew my mind to learn how the Appalachians (and other east coast mountain systems) used to be so much larger than they are today--even bigger than the Himalayas, apparently. There are scratch marks on top of my local mountains (not Appalachians, but still) that give a hint at how insane some of the glaciers during the ice age were, and then it makes you wonder at how incomprehensibly old things are...
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
The mountains are probably the one thing I miss about living in NC. I love NY, but when I think of Bilbo's wistful longing for mountains, I totally get that. So your pictures actually brought a tear to my eye. So beautemous!
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
Looks like you had a lovely hike - some impressive scenery you've got there! And Bobby and you look so happy and content. :)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
I am always so curious to know what happened that they are no longer the highest. Errosion is what the site says, but perhaps seismologic changes as well?
And a happy!Dawn and a relaxed!Bobby :D
LJ= as far as I can tell, no big screw ups of LJ happened, they have been behaving.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
What lovely landscape, so close to your home. One of the most serious drawbacks of Buenos Aires is that nothing interesting landscapewise happens in under 500 kilometers so there are no weekend hiking expeditions :( - I felt exhausted just by looking at the slopes
(no subject)
no subject
Since LJ wasn't prepared to post comments for me last week, let me wish you all the best in your future career here! I'm sure you'll have a great time :D
(no subject)
no subject
LJ's slide into evilness seems to have slowed considerably since SUP bought it, so I don't feel as guilty about continuing my paid account here as I once did. And like you, I feel bound to financially support sites I visit and use often. (I can't stand the way people refer to ad-funded sites as "free." They're not! paying a bit of cash is, in my opinion, far preferable to abusing my eyeballs and risking my privacy, which is what the ad-driven places do.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)