ETA:: Please note: As of 10 May 2009, I have collected the results for this poll. You're welcome to still contribute, if you wish, as I may return to this topic in the future, but further replies will not be used in my current essay. However, do check out the discussion on this post, which is as fabulous as I have come to expect from my flist and passersby! :) A sincere thank-you to all who participated in the poll and provided such insightful discussion of the topic. /ETA
I am getting ready to write an essay for my weble The Heretic Loremaster, and I am interested in how Tolkien fans familiar with The Silmarillion perceive the character of Maglor. I appreciate the input of anyone who has a few minutes to spare me and my LJ-created poll. :) Also, please pass the word to other Tolkienites, if you're so inclined. I would like as many responses as I can get.
If you do not have an LJ account and would like to contribute to the poll, feel free to leave an anonymous comment with your responses. (Click "Confabulate with Me" at the bottom of the post.)
Please note also that I do not expect people to look up information for this. I am interested in your perceptions of his character, not how well you can find what the book says about his character. (And, for those who do not already know, I don't believe in "canon," so I don't believe that there are right or wrong answers to any of these questions, although I certainly possess my own opinions on them. :)
[Poll #1387001]
Anything that you'd wish to add or elaborate upon, please feel free to do so in the comments. :)
I am getting ready to write an essay for my weble The Heretic Loremaster, and I am interested in how Tolkien fans familiar with The Silmarillion perceive the character of Maglor. I appreciate the input of anyone who has a few minutes to spare me and my LJ-created poll. :) Also, please pass the word to other Tolkienites, if you're so inclined. I would like as many responses as I can get.
If you do not have an LJ account and would like to contribute to the poll, feel free to leave an anonymous comment with your responses. (Click "Confabulate with Me" at the bottom of the post.)
Please note also that I do not expect people to look up information for this. I am interested in your perceptions of his character, not how well you can find what the book says about his character. (And, for those who do not already know, I don't believe in "canon," so I don't believe that there are right or wrong answers to any of these questions, although I certainly possess my own opinions on them. :)
[Poll #1387001]
Anything that you'd wish to add or elaborate upon, please feel free to do so in the comments. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 11:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 12:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 11:14 pm (UTC)It was not a gentle guy who took revenge on Uldor at the N.A. The choice to foster Elros and Elrond would be a no-brainer for someone from a family of seven siblings and not a huge moment of anguished decision. (But being a devil's advocate against myself here, I doubt that Tolkien would have realized how acutely developed are the nuturing instincts in a large family.)
It's hard for me to separate RL experience and acquired wisdom from impressions gleaned from canon. I figure they are always going to mixed in my work. (I hope to my advantage.) But I do like to find some teeny canon nudge in the direction of any characterization I pursue.
In that last part, it was almost impossible for me to choose only three. I guess all the hyperbolic descriptions about music in the spotty characterization we have for Maglor in The Silmarillion leade me to think of him as the Mozart of the Noldor. So musician and the composer of Nodolante would necessarily be a huge part of who he was.
As far as independent decision-making goes, not to try to rescue Maedhros would come next in importance for me in determining who Maglor was. To go after Maedhros would have been his gut reaction, but he chose the welfare of his people over doing so. Like I mentioned above, taking care of the kids (Elros and Elrond) for me would have been a no brainer, so not high up on the list of determining characteristic, although the historic fallout from it would be large indeed within Tolkien's story cycle.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 12:17 am (UTC)I'm curious where "gentle Maglor" is to be found in canon.
Imho, he's not. I know that some people will swear that he is listed as the gentle son who is most like his mother, but JRRT (or CT) never tell us who that is. I think an argument can be made for Maedhros or Maglor as the gentlest, and I have a hard time choosing. I chose Maglor simply because, in my verse, he tends to construct around himself the impression of being softer and gentler than his brothers ... but in a pinch, he's always the most courageous. (This from his slaying of Uldor, when I think that--if that was part of a fanfic and not the texts--most people would whine about how it's not canon! :) And it certainly takes some guts to regularly defy Feanor's expectations as he does (in the Felakverse).
I also find it interesting that you mentioned his identity as a musician and how that makes him likely not gentle. Do you get the feeling that most people see it the other way around? (I do.) That because he's the musician and not a warrior or a metalsmith or hunter, than he's somehow softer than his father and brothers?
On E&E ... I agree. In fact, as was pointed out during the discussion about whether Maedhros threatened to kill E&E at any point, his/their decision to foster them could have been a very calculated one. Or his/their decision not to kill them. That is not to say that affection could not have eventually grown up between them, but I don't think the texts necessarily support the notion that Maglor took pity upon them simply because, in his pie-eyed innocence, he could not abide with the killing of children. It is Maedhros, after all--not Maglor--who is said to have repented the desertion of Elured and Elurin in the forest.
In that last part, it was almost impossible for me to choose only three.
Me too. :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 01:04 am (UTC)And I ended up voting for Amras as the kindest and gentlest...while I think Maedhros can be kind, and Maglor can be gentle, Amras, being the baby, was likely to be both of those things--especially thinking on the HoME version of his fate.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 01:09 am (UTC)Your reasoning on Amras is interesting; it certainly makes sense to me, especially given the late stuff in HoMe. :) I think it's possible to argue for just about every answer on the poll. (I'm kind of hoping to see someone argue for Celegorm or Caranthir as the gentlest Feanorian ... ;)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 01:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 09:29 pm (UTC)Maedhros and Maglor
M&M
are the nice guys
Celegorm, Caranthir, and Curufin
3Cs
are the jerks
Amrod and Amras
AA
are the twins, and we know not much about them
That is very simplified and very fanon, but it helped me! :)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 02:53 am (UTC)I picked musician, because if he's the best of the Noldor and second best of the Eldar, he had to have discipline and creativity. Oath, because it shows his loyalty to his father. Elrond and Elros, because it shows he cares. The Kinslayings came a very close fourth, but I couldn't pick it, and it also ties into the Oath.
His music is also the reason I picked ambitious-- you don't get to be the best without it!
I read the comments above, and there are people who think Maglor's a wimp?! (My Maglor's not very happy at that…) In my mind, he's quiet, the consummate introvert. And depending on what time period I'm writing in, has mental issues. But he survived 600 years at war, which had to include constant training even at times of "peace." He may have changed his mind-- with good reason!-- about the Oath, but that makes him just as human as the rest of us.
Gah-- I could write an essay on how I see him, but that would defeat the purpose of my stories. :P
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 09:36 pm (UTC)They're taken directly from the texts, which is probably why. :) I have a document with all the mentions of Maglor in all of the books, and I just went down the section from the Silm and made this list.
I read the comments above, and there are people who think Maglor's a wimp?!
I think among this crowd, there is a more nuanced understanding of him ... but yes, I have seen a lot of stories where he lacks courage to (for example) stand up to Celegorm after Maedhros's capture, where Celegorm is trying to move in to take the kingship. I am willing to be convinced of anything in a story, but I personally do not see that based on how Maglor is depicted in the texts. (Nor do I see that being true of Celegorm, but now I digress ... ;)
Anyway, this eventual post/essay will argue against that point. Although, polling the people who read here probably doesn't address the group most apt to use that particular fanon. :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 04:04 am (UTC)The one trait that I associate most with Maglor is one that you didn't mention, probably because it's a negative -- that is, something that can only be expressed in terms of what it is not, rather than what it is. It's always struck me that Maglor is very much Not A Leader. I don't see this as being a flaw, necessarily, but it is kind of a drawback when you find yourself Regent of the Noldor. In that respect, I think he's like the twins -- they don't strike me as real leaders, either.
I think birth order has quite a bit to do with that; Maglor and the twins were both born immediately after boys with very powerful leadership abilities, and they seem like they'd be perfectly content to be followers, and they'd be good followers, too. Just not natural leaders, and when leadership gets thrust upon them, interesting things happen as a result.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 10:02 pm (UTC)This is purely invention on my part, but I've always seen Maglor as a guy that comes through in a pinch. I view his regency the same way: He never would have chosen to play High King, and he wasn't cut out for it, but he did well enough because he had to.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 08:45 am (UTC)Considering your last question I'm recently beginning to realize that my conception of Maglor is more and more based on more obscure events than the obvious, like the reason he went to Himring when the Gap fell and didn't flee South like his other brothers. It's hard for me somehow to describe that with certain character traits, but those facts somehow shape him for me as a character more than the musician and Silmaril bit do (and the wandering the shores thingy and all happens at a point where everything is fallen to pieces anyway, so it's not that important for my conception of Maglor as a character throughout the events of the First Age). I actually seem him as a diplomatic and rational person (did I choose the latter or did I forget?), which may probably make him seem softer than his brothers but I don't think he is. Not anymore, at least.
Wow, I think it's time I put all of my thoughts into a story once more. I seem to think a lot more these days and write a lot less. It's a pity, somehow. :(
Well, and now I'm going to read the other comments. I bet that's going to be interesting.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-23 09:57 pm (UTC)I actually agree with you (although I answered all of the questions ...); I think that all of the brothers had their good and bad moments. Even the 3Cs--who tend to get vilified except among Feanatics--could not have been all bad and had their redeeming traits/moments. (Especially looking back into the earlier material; it always strikes me that JRRT introduced a stricter good-evil dichotomy between the Feanorians as he wrote.)
Considering your last question I'm recently beginning to realize that my conception of Maglor is more and more based on more obscure events than the obvious, like the reason he went to Himring when the Gap fell and didn't flee South like his other brothers.
I feel the same, which is probably why I get annoyed when, in general, fandom tends to regard him as the wishy-washy and sweet-as-pie because he was a musician and fostered E&E after Elwing took a long walk off a short pier. Maedhros gets explicit credit for taking Himring, so near to Morgoth, but Maglor tends to be overlooked for holding the Gap, which
sold really stunning khakis and sweatervestswas not only in the same region geographically as Himring but also did not have the protection of the hills that Maedhros had. As you note, when the Gap was overrun, he went to Himring--that oh-so-dangerous realm--and not into secluded/protected realms, as all of his other brothers save Maedhros did. Then, his behavior at the Nirnaeth ... yes, I think the majority of textual evidence points to him as being a much stronger and braver character than most fans seem to give him credit for. I'm really interested to see what the conclusion among Silmaniacs is; I have other tricks up my sleeve for tapping into the ff.net hive mind. ;)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 10:51 am (UTC)There, got that out of my system. I am not going to state that the books said Maglor was gentle (actually my initial gut instinct was to choose Celegorm, but folks probably would think of me mad, yet as you know I will have my reason for thinking this, but I just gonna say that this must be Rhapsy!verse that I think he's gentle (and yes fierce, impatient, outspoken, but who is to say that people who are very passionate can't be gentle? I can think of more reasons, but this is not about Fëanor's third (no Turko, it isn't)), but there is mentioning of Nerdanel "Seven sons she bore to Fëanor; her mood she bequeathed in part to some of them, but not to all." I can imagine that based on some of his acts people think of him gentle, but as far as I know Tolkien never mentioned Maglor and the word gentle anywhere near the other. Based on some of his actions, not all, and yes I am heavily influenced by HOME I have a heard time thinking him like that *all* the time. When making a balanced scorecard of all actions I do scratch my head where the whimp impression comes from. Most musicians I know aren't wimps, trust me. Secondly how much is a 'trait' as gentle in your genes and how much is this more defined by the environment you grew up in? (Thinking of the word bequeathed, did she do it when she raised her sons and how this that work, or upon the marvellous elvish conception? How does that work exactly (Steel or Pandemonium if you read this... I am curious).There is a phrase which says nurturing vs something, but I am the last of my family here to end up with this nasty headcold and my synus is clogged... LOL And I can chatter on, but I have to quit sometime. :c)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-23 10:09 pm (UTC)actually my initial gut instinct was to choose Celegorm, but folks probably would think of me mad
Personally, I think that you can defend with the texts choosing any of them. Some require more creative thinking than the others, but I think it is possible. I mean, really, we only see eensy glimpses of any single brother's life. And those moments that we do see are going to be those that 1) are worth mentioning in history (which, if Celegorm took in homeless cats, for example, probably would not be) and 2) are going to be things that are obvious to, worth mentioning by, and advantageous to mention by the fictional historians and authors of the Silm. Which Celegorm--from the moment he did ill to Luthien--was guaranteed not to get a fair shake in history.
One of my soon-to-come projects will be to poll my friends among the Tolkien community as to who they believe is the baddest Feanorian ... and then write a defense of him. >;^)
When making a balanced scorecard of all actions I do scratch my head where the whimp impression comes from.
Me neither. Throughout his time in M-e, he was just as brave as Maedhros, if not more so. He didn't fall for Morgoth's tricks. He considered forswearing the Oath. And he didn't kill himself from the pain of the Silmaril but bore it long enough to toss the thing into the sea.
Definitely not a wimp! :)
There is a phrase which says nurturing vs something
Nature versus nurture. :) I had that pounded into my brain as a psych student! The prevailing opinion (at least, when I was still studying psychology) is that it is a bit of both. People are born with a genetic predisposition to some traits (I believe introversion/extroversion might be one, but don't quote me on that), and people are also shaped by their environments over the course of their lives. In a comment above yours,
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 02:04 pm (UTC)Poor Celegorm and Curufin, alas, are not on my "gentle" list at all, although I am certain Curufin was a gentle and loving husband and father and Celegorm wasn't a total brat all the time. *coughs*
At any rate, now you know why I didn't reply to that question ;)
As question 2 is based on 1, I ignored that as well. (Although I could swear having read something along the lines of "who was ever the gentlest of the brothers" somewhere in Tolkien's writings, but although I think it was about Maglor, I am not certain, and I can't find it, so perhaps I read it somewhere else. Or I just imagined it after all.
Wasn't easy to choose just three... at first, and then I thought a bit more, and found that actually my idea of Maglor is based on four of the things you listed, and then I managed to kick the fourth one out. Hah.
I have no Maglor icon. That is very sad.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 03:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 02:23 pm (UTC)For some reason, I always think of musicians as being gentle people even though I know it's not always the case.
Courageous - I think he'd have to be if he ever performed publicly, to say nothing of the fact that he was involved in all those battles. Loyal - he did take the Oath and stand by his family even though it must have cost him. Passionate - to be a good musician, you have to be, at least about your music.
For some reason I sort of associate him with the sort of strength and courage that O'Carolan must've had - he's commonly called the last of the great Irish harpers, and despite being blind, he travelled all over Ireland in an era when that would've been exceedingly difficult. So he must've been one tough guy, but he also must've trusted others a great deal.
And he must've been a fairly tough fighter to have survived all of those First Age battles, too, although an awful lot of fanfic seems to gloss that over.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-23 10:18 pm (UTC)I like your example of O'Carolan. In the Felakverse, Maglor is very much a good guy to have around in a pinch. He is exceedingly brave, even if he doesn't put on the front that characters like Celegorm do, but if he believes in what he is doing, he will be the last to flee or fear. Because, as you say here,
And he must've been a fairly tough fighter to have survived all of those First Age battles, too, although an awful lot of fanfic seems to gloss that over.
he not only faced all those battles but also lived along the same northern border for which Maedhros was credited for bravery, and he proved braver (or cannier) than Maedhros several times as well. But that does get overlooked, which I think is a pity, as it makes him an exceedingly interesting character.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 07:20 pm (UTC)Wonderful poll, though, Dawn; it gave me a perfect opportunity to sit down and think about a character which I really haven't done much lately. For the first question, I had a hard time choosing between Maedhros and Amras, actually. I can see the youngest and last being gentle, but didn't have much to support it besides 'I like it that way'. So I chose Maedhros simply because I can see him being the nurturing, gentle, kind eldest brother taking care of his younger siblings (and younger cousins too, I'll bet). I mean, I can see all of the Sons of Feanor looking after each other because if they did one thing, it was sticking together, but Maedhros sticks out to me as probably having been the gentlest. I'm hazy on the book quotes right now so I chose 'Something else' for #2, but that's really why I chose Maedhros. As for Maglor's fostering of Elrond and Elros, while it was obviously very awesome of him to do so (for lack of a better word ;), I'm going with Oshun on this one-- being part of a large family myself, the dynamics usually result in a disposition of 'looking after' young ones.
Mini-Rant: I do always seethe at the whimpering!submissive!placid!Maglor that I've seen in a lot of fic, it makes me indignant on his behalf. What did the guy do to make people think he's a weakling, idk. >:/ Compassion and a good singing voice don't make you some teary-eyed do-nothing. *fume fume grumble*
The final question, as I mentioned above, stopped me for a bit. But after closing the Silmarillion for the first time, all breathless and overawed and feeling that funny pang in my heart that comes after reading a beautiful story, the impression Maglor left on me was not of his tragedy-- well, it was, but... mainly... I think if I recall correctly... the fact that he was Maglor the Mighty Singer who swore the darkest Oath of all time and didn't ever foreswear it even when he was tempted to do so... that's what remained in my mind. And I loved him for it. Love him for it. Will love. 8D
Of course, I'm completely biased when it comes to the Sons of Feanor and I adore them all equally. \o/! Fascinating poll, fascinating answers!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-23 10:29 pm (UTC)I share your opinion with respect to the mini-rant, too, btw. (Which probably isn't particularly surprising!) One of the things I hope(d) to show with this poll is how fans tend to form a judgment of Maglor based on only a few isolated incidents from his life. I don't know, in retrospect, if this was the best group to ask, since the people who respond have done at least the study of his character that I have, and most every comment so far mentions a grave annoyance with the Maglor-as-a-wimp motif! :D I have other tricks up my sleeve, though.
In a way, I wonder if it isn't discomfort or lack of confidence with a more nuanced characterization that makes people tend to characterize Maglor as the pie-eyed wimp. The sons of Feanor, en masse, can be intimidating to characterize. It is easy and tempting to pigeonhole each into a stereotyped identity that is supported by the most written-about moments in that character's life. For example, how many people write Celegorm as cruel, basing it on his treatment of Luthien and Dior's sons, without considering his life in Aman, as a companion of Orome and a friend to all living things? Of course, everyone who reads fanfic will be somewhat affected by it; we're social beings, so it's inevitable. All those pie-eyed Maglors and cruel Celegorms come to be seen as the "right" way to look at the texts, and when reading, it is easy to see most clearly those traits or events in a character's life that support what we believe to be true of him/her. The fact that Maglor met or exceeded the same challenges as Maedhros (for example) becomes easy to overlook.
Or, that's my theory, anyway. :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 08:25 pm (UTC)I shoud add that Maglor is/has always been/will forever be my number one elf.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-23 10:33 pm (UTC)I can say, too, that fandom itself is perhaps proof of how artistic/creative types tend not to be particularly meek or passive, else we wouldn't fight so bitterly at times over things both silly and serious. ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-22 01:30 am (UTC)His choice to throw away the Silmaril and wander in lament.
It is too hot here to elaborate. Cannot think to describe more at the moment.
Thanks for the poll. I am not hugely knowledgable about maglor.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-24 12:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-22 02:22 am (UTC)I think of Maglor as being something of an independant thinker among the brothers, but also being fiercely loyal to them; hence his following the Oath even though he doubted it, at the last, and finally, after his last brother (and liege-lord) had perished, feeling free enough to throw the remaining Silmaril into the sea.
I wish that Tolkien had elaborated on Maglor's raising Elrond and Elros. We know that Elrond grew up to be a strong and courageous and very compassionate Elf; some of that, I believe, came from Maglor.
I also confess that I don't believe that poor Maglor spent tens of thousands of years wandering the shores of Middle-earth in lament and never was seen again by other Elves. The author of the Silmarillion was, I think, dead by the time of the Ring War; and if that section was written down by someone else, or even Bilbo (who did have the benefit of information from the Elves of Rivendell); Maglor could have taken ship for the West after the departure of the Ring-bearers; it's not impossible...I can't believe the Valar would be that cruel to never let him return. I also think that eventually Maglor would have wanted to go, though it might have taken him an Age or even two to forgive himself and seek redemption and healing.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-24 12:53 am (UTC)I'm not inclined to the "wandering forever in lament" conclusion either. First of all, there's no way that anyone could know this, so I trust it about as much as I trust Pengolodh to write in truth about the kinslayings. Secondly, that particular detail has always struck me as a heroic exaggeration; it sounds much more poetic than saying, "He wandered off and who knows what happened after."
I think he could have returned to Valinor; I think he also could have died. Or he could have faded--not the fanon "death of grief" but honest t' goodness fëa-overwhelming-hroä fading. In which case, he could be looking over my shoulder right now as I type this! :)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-22 10:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-22 11:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-22 11:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-24 01:04 am (UTC)But the discussion will be here for as long as you need ... and it is interesting and certainly worth the read!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-22 02:15 pm (UTC)I tend to strongly disagree with the characterization of Maglor as overly gentle/soft/easygoing -three kinslayings, duh, not to mention quite a few other battles-, especially when it's implied that he is so because he's such a great artist. I mean, look at his father. In terms of courage, again I think he's very similar to Maedhros: probably very courageous when it came to fighting, and very cowardly when it came to morals. They did try to make amends, but still: they knew very well that what they were doing was wrong -more so, I guess, than Celegorm or Curufin ever did-, they were able to consider not doing it, but did it anyway. That I think is very damning.
I still love him (and Maedhros) though. There's no doubt he could be compassionate. His fostering of Elrond and Elros is to me one of the most touching things about the Silmarillion. But I think that to do him justice is to take into account the very dark, not at all gentle parts of his character, which after all are also what makes him such an interesting figure (and, possibly, a great artist. Daeron wasn't the nicest chap in the world either, and he did pretty well.)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-25 03:00 pm (UTC)Yes! This is a good point. I think a lot can be revealed about all of the sons of Feanor by looking at how they evolved; even the "evil" 3Cs have redeeming points in some of the earlier works. It's always felt to me like JRRT was shifting them more into a good-evil duality, which (as a reader) is never my preferred means of characterization, but which I understand is very much in keeping with the mythic style in which he was trying to write. But that he waffled so much with respect to Maedhros and Maglor and which of them raised E&E and wished to forswear the Oath, to me, has always been telling about how he saw both of their characters ... and had he lived to see the Silm to completion, perhaps the pendulum would have swung back in the other direction to Maedhros as the gentler brother. Who knows.
Anyway, at the same time, I definitely agree with you here:
I tend to strongly disagree with the characterization of Maglor as overly gentle/soft/easygoing -three kinslayings, duh, not to mention quite a few other battles-, especially when it's implied that he is so because he's such a great artist.
Looking at the list of events in his life, most of them do not support him as particularly gentle--much less a wimp--at all. And it seems to me that the stereotype of a musician/artist as effeminate or gentle is a modern one. Certainly the scops who sang of great deeds and great battles in Old English (where JRRT took so much of his inspiration) were not soft and squeamish to the ideas of violence and bloodshed. You mention Daeron as well, and I think that is further example that musicians and artists in JRRT's writings were not the soft-hearted pie-eyed wimps we would have them be. I haven't done an exhaustive review, but it seems to me that the most gifted musicians in his works were generally tough as nails.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-22 08:43 pm (UTC)Neither 'kind' nor 'gentle' is a terribly appropriate adjective to describe Feanoreans. As a group, they are proud, possessive and heated (okay, fine, hot :P). But if you wish to distinguish between them, Maglor seems slightly cooler and with less personal ambition/pride than his brothers. I do not find him more kind/gentle than Maedhros, though I would consider the twin who died in the ship (going with that version) as the least ruthless of the Sons of Feanor - he was not guilty of Doriath or the Havens, and went beyond Maedhros' words in favor of going back. So, those are my three 'candidates' (I voted Maglor) with the understanding that you can have a 'kinder, gentler' Dark Lord. They all have their moments, but their cousin Finrod is able to mop the floor with them when it comes to these traits - I could actually call him 'kind' or 'gentle' without qualifiers. Whereas I will only say that Maglor is 'kinder than his brothers' (or most of them, anyway).
I found it difficult to choose 3 pivotal events to nail down his character, but settled on ones that I thought emphasized his differences from his brothers, not the things he did in common with them. So, even though the Oath (and the Kinslayings) are huge, I glossed over them. ;)
The Mereth Aderthad was an opportunity for diplomacy and healing wounds. While Maedhros chose to abdicate to Fingolfin on his own, Maglor's presence at this Feast suggests that he supports his brother's goal. The absense of the others suggests several possibilities - they did *not* support Maedhros in his decision, or Maedhros did not trust them to behave themselves [in effect, told them to stay home], or they supported Maedhros, but did not see the need to make nice with the host of Fingolfin or the people of Doriath. Maglor's presence sets him and Maedhros apart as people with a better understanding of diplomacy and, perhaps, some wisdom. Wisdom is tricky - both Maedhros and Maglor have *some*, but neither has enough for me to count them wise. The Noldolante - which implies an understanding of their fall - is a sign of Maglor's wisdom, but he made other mistakes.
I selected Maglor's time as regent-king simply because it was the one time we see him apart from Maedhros. What is shocking about it is that he shows a lack of pride and ambition that we associate with the Noldor in general and the Feanoreans in particular. I mean, yes, he wants to get the silmarils back, and is doing what he can, even making the hard decision not to barter for his brother. But there is no question of him coveting Maedhros' leadership position, and he proves wholly loyal throughout the rest of the Age (to a fault, possibly). But I could have forced these conclusions into the Feast of Reuniting, so I've squandered one.
Certainly, something in the end-game has to count. His staunch loyalty accounts for him being the one to slay the betrayer...but I snuck in loyalty already. I wanted to take him fostering the twins (certainly, it shows compassion, and the ability to see life beyond Oath and battles). But I settled on 'doubting the Oath' - a willingness to rethink a position that the others took for granted. It shows his humility (I mean, for a proud Noldo), to admit that he might just have been wrong all along.... Letting Maedhros talk him out of this showed his to-a-fault loyalty (I think that's why he didn't join his older brother in protesting his father in the ship-burning) and his lack of personal ambition...but I've covered both of those. His choice not to die, but to live, while tossing away the jewel ties into both questioning the Oath and fostering the twins. It was a worthy candidate, but I was out of choices at that point. ;) Also, it's so depressing.....
Being a musician definitely shapes my view of him, but I went for events rather than attributes.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-10 01:53 pm (UTC)I divide the 7 sons of Feanor into 3 groups: the oldest, the youngest, and the troublemakers.
Me too! M&M, the 3Cs, and double-A. That was my mnemonic when first learning all the Silm characters! :D
I comfortably put Caranthir in with the rest and class the 3Cs as "those not well-regarded by history." The others get neutral, or even positive, depictions, but no one has much nice to say about the 3Cs.
So, those are my three 'candidates' (I voted Maglor) with the understanding that you can have a 'kinder, gentler' Dark Lord.
Totally agreed. I find it hard to justify some of the pie-eyed Maglors I find in fanfic for this very reason, especially given the wealth of "canon" that is passed over in order to come up with that characterization.
But I settled on 'doubting the Oath' - a willingness to rethink a position that the others took for granted. It shows his humility (I mean, for a proud Noldo), to admit that he might just have been wrong all along.... Letting Maedhros talk him out of this showed his to-a-fault loyalty
I hadn't thought on this too much before this poll, to be honest. (So when I speak of fans who overlook some events of his life in favor of others, I point to myself. ;) I've always seen his willingness to forsake the oath as a sign of great courage; he did not know what lay beyond that choice, but he was willing to make it. I completely agree with your explanation as well.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-23 04:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-25 03:02 pm (UTC)Your poll
Date: 2009-04-23 09:10 pm (UTC)Re: Your poll
Date: 2009-05-10 01:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-24 12:41 am (UTC)I assume you're referring to the following passage from The Silm:
So "some" of her sons but not "all" of them had apparently inherited their mother's temperament. I'll note that this does not state that Nerdanel was "gentle" but rather, firm of will, patient and empathetic. Not gentle. Digging around in the HoMe doesn't reveal anything that contradicts Nerdanel as an especially strong and wise woman. Yet her temperament as part of the second eldest son (fannishly speaking that is) becomes "gentle." Huh. One wonders why "gentleness" is assumed.
In my estimation, Maglor and Maedhros are the more complex of the brothers because -- in a work of fiction that takes a mythic view from 30,000 feet -- Tolkien spent more time and effort on their characters. Had he fleshed out the other five, I would imagine each would be equally nuanced.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-10 02:02 pm (UTC)I'll note that this does not state that Nerdanel was "gentle" but rather, firm of will, patient and empathetic. Not gentle. *snip* One wonders why "gentleness" is assumed.
Perhaps looking at her in contrast to Feanor? Though you bring up a great point; this is another one of those fanons that has weaseled its way into everyone's mind, including mine, despite little evidence in the texts. (Because--famous last fanon words!--I would have sworn that it was there! ;)
I wonder also if her faith in the Valar doesn't contribute to that impression. Yikes, now you've got me pondering another essay, and I haven't even started writing this one and already have another lined up after ... ;)
Had he fleshed out the other five, I would imagine each would be equally nuanced.
I think that the HoMe shows this as well. For example, JRRT's earliest version of Celegorm had him--not Barahir!--rescuing Finrod during the Battle of Sudden Flame. The detail that Celegorm and Curufin rescued Orodreth from Minas Tirith was conveniently edited out of the published book. C&C asked--and convinced!--their father to let Aegnor and Angrod on board the ships to Losgar in some early versions as well. I'm not sure if JRRT struck that idea, or if it just never made it into the published Silm but, in any case, I've always taken details like those to mean that JRRT certainly didn't have them in mind as unequivocal villains, even if they did end up that way in the published book.
Make that Essay #4 ... ;)