Yesterday, I came into work to find my inbox full. Well, relatively full, for me, since I don't get a lot of email at work. There has been a spam email going around the agency, one of those that promises that Bill Gates will pay you $245 per person you forward the email to. (This one!) Well, some employee, in a fit of "intelligence," managed to wrap his brain around the mathematics of $245 times the thousand or so people employed by DPSCS and decided to forward the email to every single person in the email address book.
Which, predictably, resulted in others jumping on the bandwagon and clicking Reply All to share in the bounty.
Someone replied to all with the Snopes article about the email.
Someone replied to him (using Reply All, of course), saying, "You better hope you're right!" I mean, gosh, if he's not, he stands to lose out on a quarter million dollars at least!
Finally, someone from IT replied and reminded all of the enthusiastic and soon-to-be-rich and -retired participants in thescam scheme that it violated department policy to use the email system for non-work-related purposes, and all the forwards flying around to everyone in the address book was really taxing the system.
Not like that stopped the email. Next, people started replying (to all, of course), asking to be removed from "the list" or griping about spam. The fact that they themselves had become spammers by their love of that Reply All option amused me but apparently failed to sink past those three inches or so of bone to reach the quivering, jellied mass that stands for a brain.
It perturbs me that these people are considered professionals.
It perturbs me even more that we are the Department of Public Safety, and the same people who will be eagerly checking their mailbox for the next few weeks, looking for that check from Bill Gates, are the same who make decisions about which offenders are and are not allowed back into the community.
There's a comforting thought.
Which, predictably, resulted in others jumping on the bandwagon and clicking Reply All to share in the bounty.
Someone replied to all with the Snopes article about the email.
Someone replied to him (using Reply All, of course), saying, "You better hope you're right!" I mean, gosh, if he's not, he stands to lose out on a quarter million dollars at least!
Finally, someone from IT replied and reminded all of the enthusiastic and soon-to-be-rich and -retired participants in the
Not like that stopped the email. Next, people started replying (to all, of course), asking to be removed from "the list" or griping about spam. The fact that they themselves had become spammers by their love of that Reply All option amused me but apparently failed to sink past those three inches or so of bone to reach the quivering, jellied mass that stands for a brain.
It perturbs me that these people are considered professionals.
It perturbs me even more that we are the Department of Public Safety, and the same people who will be eagerly checking their mailbox for the next few weeks, looking for that check from Bill Gates, are the same who make decisions about which offenders are and are not allowed back into the community.
There's a comforting thought.
Tags:
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 02:59 pm (UTC)I liked the one with the supposed Nieman-Marcus recipe for chocolate chip cookies, which at least had some lasting social value. It claimed that you were getting a copy, "keep it a secret," of a recipe that could only be had by paying $500 to Nieman Marcus for it. (The "keep it a secret" advisory did not prevent people from spamming everyone the knew with it, including the entire email last of the major firms I worked over the course of about 10-15 years.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 03:08 pm (UTC)I do often wonder if people sit at home, eagerly awaiting the check Bill Gates owes them. Or if anyone has ever forwarded the email to the entire address book at their workplace and then quit dramatically a minute later.
I've never received the cookie recipe email. I know of it because I used to read on Snopes a lot (read: before I discovered fandom! :^D), but that one has avoided me so far.
I really do find it disturbing that, considering the amount of responsibility some of these people have, they aren't more intelligent. Of course, I suppose this is a symptom of a nation that is considering electing for President a candidate who brags about the fact that he doesn't know how to use email.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 03:16 pm (UTC)Sorry, I do not currently have a copy of the Neiman Marcus cookie recipe, but I still love the one for Toll-house cookies on the back of the chocolate chip package! OMG!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 03:39 pm (UTC)Am adopting that answer! :D
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 03:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 03:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:29 pm (UTC)It does, doesn't it? I wonder if there is an evolutionary explanation for that. *looks around for Pandemonium*
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 11:56 pm (UTC)The Accidental Deity and in particular, Is God an Accident? contained therein.**
The late (and great) Carl Sagan and Ann Druyan's book, The Demon Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark addresses the problems of superstition nicely. Sagan's approach is also less shrill than Dick to the Dawk's is.
*Not that magical thinking or imagination is bad. In fact, it's probably good and necessary for our brain function. One just needs to know where the boundaries are.
**Disclaimer: I acknowledge my (lack of) belief system may be as popular as Sauron at a hobbit picnic (yes, I am inordinately fond of this stupid phrase) in some circles.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 03:57 pm (UTC)This discussion is kind of serendipitous because I am currently working on my final essay for American Fiction and looking at Poe's use of psychology in his short stories; one of the points in my thesis regards dualism: that the psychology in Poe's stories not only represents but requires dualist beliefs to work. I got to go back to some of my old psych texts in providing some background on this and found a statement along the same lines as Bloom's research that "everyone begins as a dualist." This has always made intuitive sense to me; it's fascinating to see the science underlying the idea.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:27 pm (UTC)0;^)))
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:36 pm (UTC)My Nelyo sees your Talban. ;)
(My Talban would be all over my Nelyo, but that's a whole different story ...)
*behaving now*
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:37 pm (UTC)Please don't behave! ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:46 pm (UTC)Bobby and I RP my characters sometimes. (We call it "character development.") Tal is a world-class perv. Someday, I'm going to actually finish the stories, and everyone will be disappointed in how un-pervy Talban really is! ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:50 pm (UTC)Oh speaking of icons! That one you have with the magnificent seven, is it one that is snaggable?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 03:09 pm (UTC)Wot? No Peter Pevensie?? I often think that if we had Ben Barnes and William Moseley for Tolkien characters, there would be no stopping the deluge of slash communities! >;^)))
Oh speaking of icons! That one you have with the magnificent seven, is it one that is snaggable?
Yes! Just please credit
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 04:07 pm (UTC)Oh LOL! Now you make me want to look if there is any Peter/Caspian out there... ;) Because you are so right!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 05:50 pm (UTC)And I'm sure, given the overtness of Christianity in the Narnia books compared to Tolkien's, that slash is even more taboo than here. >:^)))
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 05:11 pm (UTC)OK. Shame on you. Now you've hooked me. I want to read those!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 03:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:26 pm (UTC)My dad makes really awesome chocolate chip cookies using pudding, either vanilla or chocolate. They are the family favorite so far. I can send you the recipe so long as you keep it secret. ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:30 pm (UTC)Oh, yes. I promise not to spam my considerable email list with it.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:36 pm (UTC)Ain't it the truth!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 05:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 02:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 03:14 pm (UTC)My personal policy with forwards is that 1) I never send anything to my entire address book (especially since my address book is filled with people I've talked to once or twice for SWG purposes; they don't need glurgy friendship forwards) and 2) I always write my own message to go along with it. If I can't find something to say to the people I'm forwarding to justify why I'm forwarding them, then I need to rethink it before clicking SEND.
Oh, and I trim all the previous forwards and leave just the message. When people can't be bothered to take thirty seconds to trim this stuff for me but expect me to take thirty seconds scrolling to find their message in all that mess, that says something.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:33 pm (UTC)Btw, I've gotten all but one of the postcards! They came en masse today and yesterday! Mine should be arriving to you soon, judging by the pace of things, though the post office is always a mysterious entity. ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:50 pm (UTC)I'm excited about your postcards. :-D
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 03:16 pm (UTC)And I love when you show on the miniature maps where things are. I'm so much a map person, that I had to squee at this!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 02:56 pm (UTC)I agree that if Bill Gates was interested in giving anything away, Microsoft would be open source. Then it would not only be less expensive but would probably work better to. IE might not constantly screw up my CSS layouts! ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 05:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 02:59 pm (UTC)I'm glad others see the humor in it, though. That's the good thing about LJ friends!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 07:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 03:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 09:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 03:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 11:42 pm (UTC)You know... as much as I can sympathize with you and with your aching in-box - that last paragraph just sent me off. ROTFLMAO!!! As sad as it is, I fear it is also really too funny to believe.
I hope the IT service will cut all of them off their mailing privileges for a few days.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-26 02:59 pm (UTC)Before I had this job, I knew that a lot of people were either unintelligent altogether or simply lacked common sense. However, I never realized how many people with jobs requiring considerable responsibility were the same!
The other day, in a newspaper article about the current US financial crisis, I saw a quote about how most Americans assumed that the people at the top of the ladder in financial institutions were much smarter than they (the average citizen) were. The article said that it has come as a shock to a lot of people to realize how untrue that is!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-26 11:23 pm (UTC)Oh, I fear some of them *are* smarter - at least those who made sure that their personal gain is safe even inb the current crisis.
(Excuse me while I fume)