Yesterday, I came into work to find my inbox full. Well, relatively full, for me, since I don't get a lot of email at work. There has been a spam email going around the agency, one of those that promises that Bill Gates will pay you $245 per person you forward the email to. (This one!) Well, some employee, in a fit of "intelligence," managed to wrap his brain around the mathematics of $245 times the thousand or so people employed by DPSCS and decided to forward the email to every single person in the email address book.
Which, predictably, resulted in others jumping on the bandwagon and clicking Reply All to share in the bounty.
Someone replied to all with the Snopes article about the email.
Someone replied to him (using Reply All, of course), saying, "You better hope you're right!" I mean, gosh, if he's not, he stands to lose out on a quarter million dollars at least!
Finally, someone from IT replied and reminded all of the enthusiastic and soon-to-be-rich and -retired participants in thescam scheme that it violated department policy to use the email system for non-work-related purposes, and all the forwards flying around to everyone in the address book was really taxing the system.
Not like that stopped the email. Next, people started replying (to all, of course), asking to be removed from "the list" or griping about spam. The fact that they themselves had become spammers by their love of that Reply All option amused me but apparently failed to sink past those three inches or so of bone to reach the quivering, jellied mass that stands for a brain.
It perturbs me that these people are considered professionals.
It perturbs me even more that we are the Department of Public Safety, and the same people who will be eagerly checking their mailbox for the next few weeks, looking for that check from Bill Gates, are the same who make decisions about which offenders are and are not allowed back into the community.
There's a comforting thought.
Which, predictably, resulted in others jumping on the bandwagon and clicking Reply All to share in the bounty.
Someone replied to all with the Snopes article about the email.
Someone replied to him (using Reply All, of course), saying, "You better hope you're right!" I mean, gosh, if he's not, he stands to lose out on a quarter million dollars at least!
Finally, someone from IT replied and reminded all of the enthusiastic and soon-to-be-rich and -retired participants in the
Not like that stopped the email. Next, people started replying (to all, of course), asking to be removed from "the list" or griping about spam. The fact that they themselves had become spammers by their love of that Reply All option amused me but apparently failed to sink past those three inches or so of bone to reach the quivering, jellied mass that stands for a brain.
It perturbs me that these people are considered professionals.
It perturbs me even more that we are the Department of Public Safety, and the same people who will be eagerly checking their mailbox for the next few weeks, looking for that check from Bill Gates, are the same who make decisions about which offenders are and are not allowed back into the community.
There's a comforting thought.
Tags:
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 03:39 pm (UTC)Am adopting that answer! :D
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 03:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 03:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:29 pm (UTC)It does, doesn't it? I wonder if there is an evolutionary explanation for that. *looks around for Pandemonium*
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 11:56 pm (UTC)The Accidental Deity and in particular, Is God an Accident? contained therein.**
The late (and great) Carl Sagan and Ann Druyan's book, The Demon Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark addresses the problems of superstition nicely. Sagan's approach is also less shrill than Dick to the Dawk's is.
*Not that magical thinking or imagination is bad. In fact, it's probably good and necessary for our brain function. One just needs to know where the boundaries are.
**Disclaimer: I acknowledge my (lack of) belief system may be as popular as Sauron at a hobbit picnic (yes, I am inordinately fond of this stupid phrase) in some circles.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 03:57 pm (UTC)This discussion is kind of serendipitous because I am currently working on my final essay for American Fiction and looking at Poe's use of psychology in his short stories; one of the points in my thesis regards dualism: that the psychology in Poe's stories not only represents but requires dualist beliefs to work. I got to go back to some of my old psych texts in providing some background on this and found a statement along the same lines as Bloom's research that "everyone begins as a dualist." This has always made intuitive sense to me; it's fascinating to see the science underlying the idea.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:27 pm (UTC)0;^)))
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:36 pm (UTC)My Nelyo sees your Talban. ;)
(My Talban would be all over my Nelyo, but that's a whole different story ...)
*behaving now*
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:37 pm (UTC)Please don't behave! ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:46 pm (UTC)Bobby and I RP my characters sometimes. (We call it "character development.") Tal is a world-class perv. Someday, I'm going to actually finish the stories, and everyone will be disappointed in how un-pervy Talban really is! ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 04:50 pm (UTC)Oh speaking of icons! That one you have with the magnificent seven, is it one that is snaggable?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 03:09 pm (UTC)Wot? No Peter Pevensie?? I often think that if we had Ben Barnes and William Moseley for Tolkien characters, there would be no stopping the deluge of slash communities! >;^)))
Oh speaking of icons! That one you have with the magnificent seven, is it one that is snaggable?
Yes! Just please credit
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 04:07 pm (UTC)Oh LOL! Now you make me want to look if there is any Peter/Caspian out there... ;) Because you are so right!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 05:50 pm (UTC)And I'm sure, given the overtness of Christianity in the Narnia books compared to Tolkien's, that slash is even more taboo than here. >:^)))
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-23 05:11 pm (UTC)OK. Shame on you. Now you've hooked me. I want to read those!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 03:10 pm (UTC)